Translation sample


Medical Document:

Source language:


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations comparing two minimally invasive methods in permanent teeth after 12 months. Fifty pregnant women (second trimester of pregnancy), mean age 22 5.30 years, were treated by two previously trained operators. The treatment approaches tested were: chemomechanical method (CarisolvTM; MediTeam) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). A split-mouth study design was used in which the two treatments were randomly placed in 50 matched pairs of permanent teeth. The chemomechanical method (CM) was the test group and the ART was the control group. The treatments were performed in Public Health Centers. The tested restorative material was a high-strength GIC (Ketac Molar; 3M/ESPE). The restorations were placed according to the ART guidelines. Two calibrated independent examiners evaluated the restorations in accordance with ART criteria. The inter-examiner kappa was 0.97.


Target language:


本研究的目的在于评估玻璃离子接合剂(GIC)修补的临床操作,对两种最小侵害方法对于恒齿的治疗效果在12个月后进行比较。五十位孕期妇女(怀孕三至六月),平均年龄225.30岁,由两位事先训练过的操作员进行治疗。试验的治疗方法是:化学机械方法(CarisolvTM; MediTeam)以及防损修复治疗(ART)。使用分区设计,两种治疗随机施于50对恒齿上。化学机械方法(CM)是实验组,ART是对照组。治疗在公共健康中心进行。被试验的修补材料是一种高强度GIC(KetacMolar; 3M/ESPE)。修补按照ART指导方针进行。两位有资质的独立检验员按照ART标准对修补进行评估。检验员间的kappa为0.97。